|
![]() |
|
| http://ior.rml.co.uk | Published by the DTI Oil & Gas Directorate for the reservoir
engineering and IOR community in the UK. Send comments on this issue and contributions for next issue to iornewsletter@senergyltd.com by 30th April 2003. | |
| Click Here for the Main Articles Index |
Editorial |
|
![]() David Hughes |
The Newsletter is compiled by David Hughes, Senergy Ltd. on behalf of the DTI, Oil and Gas Directorate (david.hughes@senergyltd.com) Thank you for accessing the fourth issue of the SHARP IOR eNewsletter. Compared to the second issue, since the third issue was
launched on
The five most popular articles from the third issue were A Post-Well Analysis of Recent Years Exploration Drilling in the Atlantic Margin by Nick Liozou of the DTI, Britain's Oil and Gas: What We Stand To Lose by Anton Ziolkowski of Edinburgh University, Reservoir Fluid Studies by Ali Danesh of Heriot Watt University, Gas Condensate Well Productivity by Bob Mott of ECL Technology and Depressurisation of Waterflooded Reservoirs – Results From Oil-Wet and Mixed-Wettability Micromodels by Dabir Tehrani of Heriot Watt University with 150-200 visits each. Many of the features such as the Introduction and the item on AEA Technology Subsurface being sold to ECL received 170-200 visits. The statistics also show that Issues 1 and 2 are still being read. For example Air Injection Processes: Heavy Oil Recovery and In-situ Upgrading; Light Oil Recovery by Malcolm Greaves of Bath University received 314 visits in the last six months, Light Oil Recovery via Air Injection Technology, by Demetrios Yannimaras of BP (169 visits) and Brent Field Depressurisation by Rob Kuyper of Shell U.K. (174 visits). Malcolm's article is by far the most visited - unfortunately we don't have a prize! Let's see if we can double the number of hits again and reach 100,000 with this issue! In this the first anniversary issue, we again have a substantial section on
CO2 EOR and sequestration. This seems to be the "hot" topic of the
moment. The UK Government is considering how it can meet its commitments in
relation to greenhouse gas emissions under We also have a section on Production System Optimisation. Vendors have brought
forward a number of software solutions to this problem and I am grateful to
No feedback was received (in terms of emails to the editor) on any of the posted items in Issue 3. Once you have read an article please be forthcoming with your comments (to iornewsletter@senergyltd.com) - feel free to get a vigorous debate going. We will include a selection of these in a "Feedback" section in the next issue. We also need a new "Talking Point" or two for the next issue. Is there something you want to get off you chest? Hello out there - where are the universities? We only have two contributions is this issue from universities (thanks to UCL and Heriot Watt). Please use this newsletter to keep us informed about your ongoing projects or on any ideas that you have for new IOR-related projects. After all, this newsletter is read by representatives of funding bodies and potential industry sponsors. Thank you to everyone who provided items for inclusion in
this issue. Thanks are also due to If you would like to submit an article or other contribution for inclusion
in the next issue of the newsletter, please provide the text in a Word document.
However, please do not embed any graphic objects in the Word document. Please
send these as separate .jpg or another high quality graphic format files. Keeping
the graphics files separate provides us with better originals than we are able
to extract from .doc files. Ideally the .doc file and the graphics files should
be zipped up into a single file prior to submission. Please keep contributions
relatively short and make liberal use of hyperlinks to other material on your
own website. The next edition of the SHARP IOR eNewsletter is due to be published
in May 2003. Contributions should be submitted to iornewsletter@senergyltd.com
by The newsletter is distributed via an email notification with hyperlinks to the newsletter itself. We would like to send the email to a single contact within each organisation for onward distribution within that organisation. Please would you liaise with others in your organisation, and set up an email address of the form (for example) iordistribution@xyz.co.uk which is itself a mailing list of those wishing to receive the email notification, which is maintained by your organisation. Please let me know when you have set up such an email address and emails notifying future issues will be sent to your distribution email address. |
|
| Disclaimer: |
Disclaimer: The material available on this website is designed to provide general information only. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure that the information provided is accurate, it does not constitute legal or other professional advice. |
|